Skip to main content
Gassnova
 
Search button icon
  • Newsletter
  • News & media
  • Organisation
  • Contact
  • CCS dictionary
  • About Gassnova
    • Carbon Capture and Storage
    • CCS Knowledge
    • About Gassnova
  • Research and development (CLIMIT)
    • Main
    • Apply for funding
    • Projects
    • About CLIMIT Programme
    • CLIMIT`s Project Portfolio
    • CLIMIT Summit
    • USA & Norway Collaboration
  • Demo of CO2-capture (TCM)
  • Experience from Longship
    • Main
    • About Longship
    • Search in documents/reports from Longship
    • Timeline
View all posts in news News
DOE-skilt. Foto

10.03.2022

DoE is criticized for poor financial management of CCS projects

The US Government Accountability Office has investigated the Department of Energy’s allocations and follow-up of nine major CCS demonstration projects.

In a report published in December, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) provided information on investigations into DoE funding allocations and follow-up of nine large CCS demonstration projects.

$1.1 billion in support

In total, the DoE awarded $1.1 billion in support over the period 2009-17. Of the projects supported, six were linked to power generation ($684 million) and three to industrial processes ($438 million). Of the power generation projects, only one was successfully completed (Petra Nova), but even this was closed down in 2020 after only three years in operation.

Of the industry projects, two were completed (Air Products, Texas and Archer Daniels, Illinois). The GAO has two recommendations:

  • that the DoE improve its project selection and negotiation processes and
  • that they be more consistent in their follow-up of projects with regards to their scope, timelines and budgets.

The recommendations were particularly aimed at flaws in the DoE’s selection of coal-fired energy projects that they believe were rushed and not completed according to proper regulations. This also covered the assessment of market related conditions to do with the prospects of coal vs. natural gas. According to the GAO, this led to substantial extra costs for taxpayers.

Edit this text area as you want, make headings and paragraphs…
Report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO Sign up for our weekly CCS newsletter
Related articles
Hender som holder jordkloden. Illustrasjon

The US is trying to balance climate and economic considerations – CCS is getting more attention

Scheme for financing industrial CCS projects These events have affected the scheme for financing industrial CCS projects – known as 45Q – which has now been proposed to be revised to provide increased flexibility, broader scope, a longer timeframe and – last but not least – more money. The new proposal involves payment of up …

Jordklode på grønt underlag. Illustrasjon

CCS Environmental Analysis, January

Trouble for natural gas and nuclear energy: Disputes over the EU taxonomy The European Commission recently presented its long-awaited regulatory proposal as to how natural gas and nuclear energy should be treated in the EU taxonomy for sustainable finance activities. Different forums of discussion Energy types are essentially only entered into the taxonomy for a …

footer logo

Gassnova is working to reduce emissions in the industry. Our efforts to promote technology development and competence building will contribute to more cost-effective and future-oriented solutions for the capture, transport and storage of CO2 (CCS).

 

gassnova sf
Contact
Email: postmottak@gassnova.no
  • linkedin social icon
  • youtube social icon
gassnova © 2025
Web design & Web development by Increo
webmaster Privacy policy